top of page
  • Writer's pictureRobert Schuerger II

Liability in Animal Attack Cases: What Is the One-bite Rule in Tennessee?

In today's fast-paced world, understanding the responsibilities and challenges a dog's owner faces is crucial. Navigating the nuances of having a dog under reasonable control isn't just about obedience but a journey filled with learning and mutual respect.

Whether it's an energetic puppy or a wise old companion, every dog owned brings unique joys and trials. Dealing with the complexities of dog ownership extends beyond mere companionship since it involves understanding legal responsibilities, such as the 'one-bite rule.'

A critical aspect of liability, this rule shapes the legal landscape for owners when incidents occur. In this article, readers will explore the intricacies of this rule, learning how it affects the canine, its owner, and the injured person in a legal case. Schuerger Shunnarah Trial Attorneys can also answer questions like Can my dog bite someone to protect me?

What Is the One-bite Rule in Tennessee?

What Is the One-bite Rule in Tennessee?

The state's approach to dog bite laws stands out with its unique blend of traditional and specific rules, mainly seen in the "one-bite regulation." This law is a crucial part of Tennessee dog bite laws and significantly influences the liability of dog owners in bite cases.

Unlike many states, the dog attack statute in Tennessee uses both the one-bite law and the concept of strict liability, creating a distinctive legal landscape for dog attack cases.

Moreover, this rule implies that a dog's owner may not be held liable for a canine bite if it's the first time the pet has exhibited aggressive behavior and the owner has no prior knowledge of the dog's dangerous propensities.

It grants a dog "one free bite" before the owner can be considered aware of and responsible for the dog's potential danger.

Strict Liability in Dog Bite Cases

Under Tennessee dog bite law, strict liability is a crucial concept, distinctly different from the one-bite regulation. This principle makes dog owners automatically liable for injuries caused by their pets without needing to establish negligence or awareness of the pet's dangerous tendencies.

Strict liability mainly applies in public areas or on private property where a person lawfully sustains a dog bite injury. Unlike the one-bite principle, where liability hinges on the owner's prior knowledge of their dog's aggressive nature, strict liability focuses on the incident itself, irrespective of the pet's past behavior.

The stark contrast between strict liability and the one-bite rule simplifies the process for dog bite victims seeking compensation. Under strict liability, the path to legal recourse is more straightforward, as it removes the burden of proving the dog owner's prior knowledge of the pet's propensity for danger. 

This approach emphasizes the importance of owners maintaining control over their pets to prevent incidents and upholding their responsibilities in public and private spaces.

The Circumstances Impacting Dog Owner Liability

Tennessee dog bite laws present various scenarios influencing an owner's liability. Key situations include:

  • Incidents occurring on the dog owner's property

  • Cases with elements of trespassing or provocation

  • Situations involving a military or police dog

The law often reverts to the one-bite regulation when a dog attack occurs on the owner's property. This means that the law can hold the dog owner liable only if they knew or should have known about the pet's dangerous tendencies. It's a crucial consideration for a dog bite claim on private, non-commercial property. Schuerger Shunnarah Trial Attorneys can also give insight on what is considered a serious dog bite.

In cases involving military or police dogs, the law typically exempts the dog owner (or handler) from liability, provided the dog was performing its official duties and was under proper control. Moreover, this exemption recognizes these dogs' unique role in law enforcement and public safety.

Provokation and Trespassing in Cases Involving Dog Bites

If an injured person provoked the pet or was trespassing at the time of the bite, these factors can significantly change the dog owner's liability. Provocation can include any action that might reasonably agitate the dog, while trespassing refers to unauthorized entry onto personal property.

Understanding these specific circumstances is vital in dog bite lawsuits in Tennessee. They can determine whether a canine owner is strictly liable or if other factors mitigate their responsibility. Each dog attack case is unique, and these nuances play a significant role in the legal process and outcome.

Legal Outcomes of Dog Bite Incidents: Understanding the Consequences

When a dog attack incident occurs, the consequences can vary based on several factors. In Tennessee, if a canine causes injuries, the legal focus often shifts to whether the dog's owner knew of the pet's aggressive tendencies.

If it's proven that the owner was aware or should have known of the dog's potential for harm, they may be found liable for the injuries caused. This is particularly critical in dog bite claims, where establishing the owner's prior knowledge can influence the outcome.

However, if the injured person provoked the pet, this could affect the case, potentially reducing the owner's dog bite liability. Also, suppose the injury occurred on the property of the dog's owner. In that situation, the process can get complex, requiring a detailed investigation to resolve the dog bite case.

The severity of the dog bite injuries also plays a key role in determining the legal consequences. Moreover, the injured person often seeks compensation for the harm suffered, making it essential for both parties to understand their rights and responsibilities.

The Importance of Legal Assistance When Dealing with Tennessee Dog Bite Laws

The Importance of Legal Assistance When Dealing with Tennessee Dog Bite Laws

Navigating the dog bite laws can be difficult, especially given the intricate details of cases involving dog bites and their outcomes. Whether an injured person or a dog owner, understanding the nuances of the dog bite law and how it applies to their situation is crucial.

This is where legal assistance becomes invaluable. An experienced dog bite attorney in Nashville TN can unravel the complexities of dog bite cases, ensuring that all aspects, from strict liability to the complexities of the one-bite rule, are thoroughly examined and addressed.

Schuerger Shunnarah Trial Attorneys stands ready to offer its expertise to Tennessee residents. Embodying our motto, "We go to war for you," we are committed to advocating fiercely on behalf of our clients, providing the necessary guidance and representation in a dog bite lawsuit or a personal injury case.

Concluding Thoughts

Tennessee's dog bite law, particularly the one-bite regulation, is crucial in determining liability in cases involving dog bites. This rule shapes the legal landscape for the injured person and the dog owner.

Alongside strict liability, the law considers nuances of each incident, such as the involvement of a military dog, where the injury occurred, or cases involving an innocent party. Understanding these laws and their implications is essential for anyone involved in a dog bite case.

Moreover, for comprehensive legal support and guidance, Schuerger Shunnarah Trial Attorneys is equipped to handle dog bite claims with expertise and commitment, ensuring injured persons' rights are protected and their case is effectively represented.


bottom of page